偶然在一家外国网站上看到的——丹国万年

昨天偶然在一家英文网站看到一个小钱，我没见过，感觉挺有意思的，转过来给大家看看：）





Weight, g: 1.6

Size, mm: 23.9
拥有者：ONLY LINDA
还有两条评论，其中一个评论者很眼熟：）
Chinasmith ：This must be a privately made coin, apparently from the time of Sung and Liao. The characters are very thick and heavy, like many 19th century forgeries. But if this coin was found in a Sung hoard, perhaps we need to reconsider those coins with thick characters.
chinese_cash ：The back is much nicer than the front...appears as if there was some work done on the front.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-21 12:25:31编辑过]

俺文化低不懂英文，能翻译吗？最好给个网站连接

有点意思！[s:01]

Chinasmith ：This must be a privately made coin, apparently from the time of Sung and Liao. The characters are very thick and heavy, like many 19th century forgeries. But if this coin was found in a Sung hoard, perhaps we need to reconsider those coins with thick characters.
此泉品应是私铸品，是宋辽时期的。其特点是：厚，且重，如同19世纪的其他仿制品一样。但如果此泉品是在宋朝钱中发现的话，那它可能也是厚身的。
chinese_cash ：The back is much nicer than the front...appears as if there was some work done on the front. 此泉品背面比正面好很多，正面好像修改过。

以下是引用小林子在2006-5-21 12:42:19的发言：
Chinasmith ：This must be a privately made coin, apparently from the time of Sung and Liao. The characters are very thick and heavy, like many 19th century forgeries. But if this coin was found in a Sung hoard, perhaps we need to reconsider those coins with thick characters.
此泉品应是私铸品，是宋辽时期的。其特点是：厚，且重，如同19世纪的其他仿制品一样。但如果此泉品是在宋朝钱中发现的话，那它可能也是厚身的。
chinese_cash ：The back is much nicer than the front...appears as if there was some work done on the front. 此泉品背面比正面好很多，正面好像修改过。
翻译的很好！

外国人不看好这个东西啊，拿回来得了！

欣赏   谢谢楼主[s:10][s:24]

这个东西如果真，肯定不是什么私铸，而是契丹早期“丹”字系列钱中的孤珍，我个人看不明白真假，真假大家自鉴。

下面这东西是开门珍，ＣＣ先生以前在开元泉社发过（感觉没这张清晰度好），后来不知什么原因又给删掉了，景福真品已知共两枚，这是其中一枚：）

这个版的天禄还真没见过：）



Weight, g: 3.51

Size, mm: 24.7